From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Mar 31 17:07:31 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 614711065749; Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:07:31 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Emanuel Haupt Message-ID: <20090331170731.GA16533@FreeBSD.org> References: <200903301508.n2UF8V0S004945@repoman.freebsd.org> <20090331162207.GC49753@hades.panopticon> <20090331183519.64041cff.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090331183519.64041cff.ehaupt@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, Dmitry Marakasov , cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/archivers/deb2targz Makefile ports/devel/cvsspam Makefile ports/dns/sshfp Makefile ports/dns/vizone Makefile ports/games/textmaze Makefile ports/mail/delatt Makefile ports/misc/shuffle-db Makefile ports/sysutils/areca-cli Makefile ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 17:07:33 -0000 On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 06:35:19PM +0200, Emanuel Haupt wrote: > > * Emanuel Haupt (ehaupt@FreeBSD.org) wrote: > > > > > Modified files: > > > archivers/deb2targz Makefile > > > devel/cvsspam Makefile > > > dns/sshfp Makefile > > > dns/vizone Makefile > > > games/textmaze Makefile > > > mail/delatt Makefile > > > misc/shuffle-db Makefile > > > sysutils/areca-cli Makefile > > > sysutils/rej Makefile > > > textproc/colordiff Makefile > > > www/bannerfilter Makefile > > > www/linklint Makefile > > > x11-themes/audacious-skins Makefile > > > x11-themes/irssi-themes Makefile > > > Log: > > > Remove MAKE_JOBS_SAFE, port has no build target. > > > > Do we not mark such port as MAKE_JOBS_SAFE? > > > > I mean, if there's no build target they really are safe, and marking > > them as such will help to identify yet unmarked/untested ports. > > MAKE_JOBS_SAFE would be a NOP. I strongly discourage using it for > documentation purposes only. Agreed. Once we identify and fix vast majority of the problems, I believe MAKE_JOBS_SAFE can (and I hope would) be removed. ./danfe