Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 4 May 1997 19:25:06 +0200
From:      j@uriah.heep.sax.de (J Wunsch)
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Sendmail.cf patch #2..
Message-ID:  <19970504192506.HW37541@uriah.heep.sax.de>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970505002548.2439A-100000@obiwan.psinet.net.au>; from Adrian Chadd on May 5, 1997 00:29:23 %2B0800
References:  <199705041640.SAA06021@sos.freebsd.dk> <Pine.BSF.3.95q.970505002548.2439A-100000@obiwan.psinet.net.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
As Adrian Chadd wrote:

> Thing is, spam-rejection is a nice bandwidth-saver.. and there are a lot
> of places where bandwidth is expensive (eg Australia). Blocking it before
> the mail is sent would save a lot of money, ...

But it totally fails if your MXes don't want to block the same list as
you do.

-- 
cheers, J"org

joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de -- http://www.sax.de/~joerg/ -- NIC: JW11-RIPE
Never trust an operating system you don't have sources for. ;-)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?19970504192506.HW37541>