Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:17:09 +0100 From: Jesper Skriver <jesper@skriver.dk> To: Vincent Poy <vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET> Cc: "Seo Boon, NG" <sbng@employees.org>, freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Dynamic routing reference sites Message-ID: <20010101171709.B87186@skriver.dk> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.31.0012311401010.2211-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>; from vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET on Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:01:54PM -1000 References: <20010101004930.A9470@cisco.com> <Pine.BSF.4.31.0012311401010.2211-100000@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 02:01:54PM -1000, Vincent Poy wrote: > On Mon, 1 Jan 2001, Seo Boon, NG wrote: > > > Wrote Vincent Poy on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 07:40:02PM SGT > > | > > | yeah, they don't but doesn't AboveNet peer with everyone, it seems > > | like it will take a few gigs of routes for those. > > > > you typically do not get anything close to a full view when you peer. A peer > > only announce itself and it's customer. Hence, u can have many peers but it's > > rarely that u'll see 'gigs' of routes for all the peers. > > Yes but aren;t you supposed to get routes from each peer to build > your own routing table? Yes, but you'll only get full routing from your transit providers, a normal bilateral peering doesn't provide transit, so each provider will only announce their own + customer routes. /Jesper -- Jesper Skriver, jesper(at)skriver(dot)dk - CCIE #5456 Work: Network manager @ AS3292 (Tele Danmark DataNetworks) Private: Geek @ AS2109 (A much smaller network ;-) One Unix to rule them all, One Resolver to find them, One IP to bring them all and in the zone to bind them. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010101171709.B87186>