Date: Fri, 07 Jan 2011 13:34:29 -0800 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Tom Judge <tom@tomjudge.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, ohauer@FreeBSD.org, wxs@FreeBSD.org, Douglas Thrift <douglas@douglasthrift.net> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: isc-dhcp41-server-4.1.2,1; Concurrent IPv4 DHCP and DHCPv6 Message-ID: <4D2786E5.7080907@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <4D277BA5.6020007@tomjudge.com> References: <4D243672.4040803@douglasthrift.net> <4D266320.2020803@FreeBSD.org> <4D277015.8010107@FreeBSD.org> <4D2771C4.3040306@FreeBSD.org> <4D277BA5.6020007@tomjudge.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/07/2011 12:46, Tom Judge wrote: > Hi Doug, > > I think (imho) the apache style scripts are better than the one in > openvpn for example. > > The main reason for this is that they are more along the lines of how > other platforms have implemented this feature. That's not a reason either to, or not to do something in FreeBSD. The rc.d system is substantially different that sysV style init.d, and has more capabilities in some ways. > Maybe we need a more generic way of doing this rather than each port > providing their own implementation? I agree, and I thought I made that point in my initial post. :) Doug -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4D2786E5.7080907>