Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2011 19:31:36 -0700 From: milki <milki@rescomp.berkeley.edu> To: Stanislav Sedov <stas@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ruby@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: making Ruby 1.9 default Message-ID: <20110317023136.GN32667@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> In-Reply-To: <20110316134220.d92eb20d.stas@FreeBSD.org> References: <1300272269.1973.16.camel@localhost> <C9A64EB6.1DFF2%freebsdlists-ruby@chillibear.com> <20110316160048.GM32667@hal.rescomp.berkeley.edu> <20110316134220.d92eb20d.stas@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 13:42 Wed 16 Mar , Stanislav Sedov wrote: > > I've been hanging out at #bsdports@efnet and I've gathered that is the > > consensus of committers that portupgrade is no longer maintained and > > portmaster is the preferred tool. The docs need some patching to reflect > > this. > > > > It's not true, it's officially maintained by ruby@, which for portupgrade > was effectively mainly me for the past years. Unfortunately, I don't have > enough resources to make significant changes there. Given that there are so many PRs and I emailed the official maintainer (ruby@) with a small 2 line patch suggestion and received no feedback, I'd say its pretty good as not maintained. --milki
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110317023136.GN32667>