Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 13 Dec 2002 11:40:38 -0500
From:      Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>
To:        standards@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   strerror()
Message-ID:  <20021213114038.A61753@espresso.q9media.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I'm working on fixing strerror_r() in light of PR 44356.  I'm
wondering if anyone can explain why strerror() has an inline itoa
procedure, instead of using snprintf(3).  The comment says:
/* Do this by hand, so we don't link to stdio(3). */
...and the commit log says:
revision 5.6
date: 1991/05/04 13:45:45;  author: bostic;  state: Exp;  lines: +20 -6
don't include stdio(3), do itoa inline

I thought it may have been to make strerror() async-signal-safe, but
POSIX doesn't list it as an async-signal-safe function.

Best regards,
Mike Barcroft

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-standards" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021213114038.A61753>