From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Oct 10 17:25:53 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from lavender.sanpei.org (nat06.st.keio.ac.jp [131.113.17.16])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CFEF437B66C
	for <ports@FreeBSD.org>; Tue, 10 Oct 2000 17:25:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from sanpei@localhost)
	by lavender.sanpei.org (8.11.0/3.7W) id e9B0PO605044;
	Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:25:24 +0900 (JST)
Message-Id: <200010110025.e9B0PO605044@lavender.sanpei.org>
To: jeremy@external.org
Cc: walter@pelissero.org, ports@FreeBSD.org
From: sanpei@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: xmovie 1.5.2 for FreeBSD
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 10 Oct 2000 12:57:28 -0500"
References: <20001010125728.A1592@external.org>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.70 on Emacs 19.34.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2000 09:25:19 +0900
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

>> I've seen only a 1.3.1_1.  I would be disappointed to see a 1.5.2.1,
>> because I've looked carefully before investing my weekend in this
>> port.
>> 
>> I don't know if I'm willing to make an "official" port.  As I pointed
>> out in my previous message that patch corrects bugs present even in
>> the Linux version.  The author has been informed and I expect him to
>> come up with a new release soon (possibly including the FreeBSD port).
>> 
>> A port from that relese will be much smaller and cleaner.
>> 
>
>If you can build a native xmovie I think that would be preferable than using
>the Linuxulator which the current (1.5.2.1) xmovie port does.

  I'm currently maintainer of graphics/xmovie.  I created
xmovie-1.5.2.1 port but using Linuxemulator. I'm glad to use FreeBSD
native version.  
  Do you(Walter C. Pelissero) become maintainer for xmovie?
---
MIHIRA, Sanpei Yoshiro
Yokohama, Japan.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message