From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 6 21:36:13 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92B46106566B for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:36:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jpg@griffin.gnix.co.uk) Received: from griffin.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [80.229.5.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38C2A8FC15 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 21:36:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from griffin.gnix.co.uk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by griffin.gnix.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CEA2229E9 for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:43:50 +0100 (BST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gnix.co.uk Received: from griffin.gnix.co.uk ([127.0.0.1]) by griffin.gnix.co.uk (griffin.gnix.co.uk [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id uTObEBe7q9gJ for ; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:43:47 +0100 (BST) Received: by griffin.gnix.co.uk (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 62BFB2297B; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:43:47 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 22:43:47 +0100 From: Jamie Paul Griffin To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20110406214347.GA1411@griffin.gnix.co.uk> References: <20110406165821.GB44782@griffin.gnix.co.uk> <201104061924.29225.bruce@cran.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201104061924.29225.bruce@cran.org.uk> X-PGP-Key: http://gnix.co.uk/jpg-pubkey.asc X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.1-RELEASE-p2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Subject: Re: GEOM warning in dmesg X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 21:36:13 -0000 On Wed, Apr 06, 2011 at 07:24:29PM +0100, Bruce Cran wrote: > On Wednesday 06 Apr 2011 17:58:21 Jamie Paul Griffin wrote: > > > i'm sorry but that doesn't make any sense at all. could you explain a > > solution more clearly please? > > There's no problem. Maybe MS-DOS or Windows 95 would have problems with such a > layout, but modern operating systems don't. i am sure you're right but i simply didn't understand what he was trying to say and i really only wanted to understand what the warnings meant. jamie