Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 5 Aug 1997 22:52:34 -0400 (EDT)
From:      Tim Vanderhoek <tim@x22>
To:        Michael Smith <msmith@atrad.adelaide.edu.au>
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Current is currently really a mess (was: Re: Tk/Tcl broken(?))
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.970805224959.1269A-100000@x22>
In-Reply-To: <199708060119.KAA01570@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 6 Aug 1997, Michael Smith wrote:

> Tim Vanderhoek stands accused of saying:
> > 
> > Doesn't something seem very wrong with saying "Ok, we're going to
> > have Tcl in the base system, but no applications are allowed to
> > use it."?
> 
> No.  Applications can _use_ it; what is wrong is the ports collection
> _depending_ on it.

Where "applications" roughly equals "ports".

Yes, that I agree with completely.  I may have misunderstood your
intent (I was relying on your prev. messages than this one
specifically).


--
 tIM...HOEk
OPTIMIZATION: the process of using many one-letter variables names
              hoping that the resultant code will run faster.




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.970805224959.1269A-100000>