From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 16 21:11:28 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6279A16A4CE for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:11:28 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mr.tuwien.ac.at (mr2-n.kom.tuwien.ac.at [128.131.2.110]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A7EC43DBD for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 21:11:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from e0025265@student.tuwien.ac.at) Received: from webmail.zserv.tuwien.ac.at (lps.ben.tuwien.ac.at [193.170.74.11]) by mr.tuwien.ac.at (8.12.10/8.12.8) with SMTP id j4GLBL1j019200 for ; Mon, 16 May 2005 23:11:22 +0200 (MEST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: V-webmail 1.5.1 ( http://www.v-webmail.co.uk/ ) Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:11:22 +0200 From: "Florian Hengstberger" To: FreeBSD mailinglist X-Vwebmail-Auth: e0025265@stud3.tuwien.ac.at X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-milter (http://amavis.org/) Subject: tetex, latex, dvips X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 21:11:28 -0000 Hi! Why do latex and tetex conflict? Firstly I installed latex but couldnt find the koma package but all tools (dvips, xdvi ...). So I removed latex and installed tetex-base and tetex-texmf. Koma works fine, but I can only produce pdf with pdflatex. dvips is not present and xdvi tells me that there are a lot of fonts missing! When I try to install dvips I get the following message: ===> Installing for dvips-5.76 ===> dvips-5.76 conflicts with installed package(s): teTeX-base-2.0.2_2 teTeX-texmf-2.0.2 They install files into the same place. Please remove them first with pkg_delete(1). *** Error code 1 Stop in /usr/ports/print/dvips. How can a tex distribution conflict with and dvi to ps converter??? Am I doing something completly wrong? Thanks a lot, Florian