Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2005 13:14:36 +0100 From: Michael Nottebrock <michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Cc: lofi@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: foomatic-filters-3.0.2 Message-ID: <200501281314.39973.michaelnottebrock@gmx.net> In-Reply-To: <BE1FE72E.17064%tomonage2@gmx.de> References: <BE1FE72E.17064%tomonage2@gmx.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--nextPart3537553.BvYCmdttL5 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Friday, 28. January 2005 12:57, Jonathan Weiss wrote: > Hi! > > > I just saw that you commited a foomatic-filters port. > Maybe you can have a look at ports/76249. This is a more complex port for > foomatic-filters that also registers itself as a cups-filter if cups is > present. All the exists(foo) checking is rather bad style, I'd like to keep that out= of=20 the port (the package will install all the bits into the right locations in= =20 my port, but not pull in any runtime dependencies - if the user needs a fil= e=20 conversion filter, he can just add the package). I'll add the cups-filter bit, I assumed foomatic-filters would do that=20 automatically but apparently it doesn't. In what scenario is fdescfs needed to work properly? I've been using=20 foomatic-rip / foomatic-gswrapper on my own systems for a while now without= =20 fdescfs and didn't have problems. =2D-=20 ,_, | Michael Nottebrock | lofi@freebsd.org (/^ ^\) | FreeBSD - The Power to Serve | http://www.freebsd.org \u/ | K Desktop Environment on FreeBSD | http://freebsd.kde.org --nextPart3537553.BvYCmdttL5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBB+iyvXhc68WspdLARAuD0AKCo+Z8UHSWHeH1PUxAizxTnnHv/ggCeM1e3 HWWu72WeOzKakgQ1CjjOa/k= =5OK1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart3537553.BvYCmdttL5--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200501281314.39973.michaelnottebrock>