Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 14 Apr 2011 12:49:41 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Jung-uk Kim <jkim@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: svn commit: r220584 - in head/sys: amd64/amd64 i386/i386
Message-ID:  <4DA6D145.8070804@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <201104131827.39373.jkim@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <201104122349.p3CNn7kK039179@svn.freebsd.org> <4DA6189A.5040200@FreeBSD.org> <4DA61A70.8040609@FreeBSD.org> <201104131827.39373.jkim@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--------------090705030302090306020404
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

On 2011-04-14 00:27, Jung-uk Kim wrote:
...
>> will still read 0 from MSR_MPERF, leading to a division by zero.
>> Maybe just fallback to the second method in the 'else' branch then?
>
> That means your VM has broken CPUID support.  To get there, it has to
> meet two conditions, i.e., TSC is invariant and it has APERF/MPERF
> MSRs.

Well, VM hosts like VMware and VirtualBox usually just return the
'native' CPUID values to guests, but can't really support stuff like
those MSRs, for all kinds of reasons.

I was just looking at this from a viewpoint of "it worked for years, and
now it broke". :)

In any case, I don't see why a bit of defensive programming would be bad
here, so I propose the following patch to revert to the 'old' way of
estimating the rate, in case reading the MPERF MSR returns zero.

--------------090705030302090306020404
Content-Type: text/plain;
 name="est-zero-mcnt-workaround-1.diff"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
 filename="est-zero-mcnt-workaround-1.diff"

Index: sys/i386/i386/machdep.c
===================================================================
--- sys/i386/i386/machdep.c	(revision 220620)
+++ sys/i386/i386/machdep.c	(working copy)
@@ -1172,7 +1172,7 @@ cpu_est_clockrate(int cpu_id, uint64_t *rate)
 		acnt = rdmsr(MSR_APERF);
 		tsc2 = rdtsc();
 		intr_restore(reg);
-		perf = 1000 * acnt / mcnt;
+		perf = (mcnt != 0) ? 1000 * acnt / mcnt : 1000;
 		*rate = (tsc2 - tsc1) * perf;
 	} else {
 		tsc1 = rdtsc();
Index: sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c
===================================================================
--- sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c	(revision 220620)
+++ sys/amd64/amd64/machdep.c	(working copy)
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ cpu_est_clockrate(int cpu_id, uint64_t *rate)
 		acnt = rdmsr(MSR_APERF);
 		tsc2 = rdtsc();
 		intr_restore(reg);
-		perf = 1000 * acnt / mcnt;
+		perf = (mcnt != 0) ? 1000 * acnt / mcnt : 1000;
 		*rate = (tsc2 - tsc1) * perf;
 	} else {
 		tsc1 = rdtsc();

--------------090705030302090306020404--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4DA6D145.8070804>