From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 18 16:39:41 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mail2.panix.com (mail2.panix.com [166.84.0.213]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92C49150F0; Fri, 18 Jun 1999 16:39:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tomg@nrnet.org) Received: from mailhost.nrnet.org (tomg@mailhost.nrnet.org [166.84.192.39]) by mail2.panix.com (8.8.8/8.8.8/PanixM1.3) with ESMTP id TAA09989; Fri, 18 Jun 1999 19:39:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (tomg@localhost) by mailhost.nrnet.org (8.8.7/8.8.4) with SMTP id SAA02235; Fri, 18 Jun 1999 18:37:48 -0400 Date: Fri, 18 Jun 1999 18:37:47 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Good To: Dennis Cc: Greg Lehey , FreeBSD Hackers , FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: Beware of UnixWare 7 In-Reply-To: <199906181644.MAA05370@etinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, 18 Jun 1999, Dennis wrote: > > >Many conf tasks remain non-trivial as compared to BSD or Linux due > >to inexpertise on SCO's end...as the red Sytem Admin Handbook once > >stated (Neveth, Snyder et al.) SCO Unix* is `perverse'. > > I enjoy reading the section in that book on network hardware whenever I > need a good laugh. People shouldnt attempt to write about things that they > so clearly know nothing about. > > Dennis Argumentum ad hominem? Or simply ad absurdum? You won't find many SCO fans amongst those who've used more than one implementation of unix...and Novell getting out of the Unix business (and taking a beating for doing it) speaks volumes. ------- North Richmond Community Mental Health Center ------- Thomas Good MIS Coordinator Vital Signs: tomg@ { admin | q8 } .nrnet.org Phone: 718-354-5528 Fax: 718-354-5056 /* Member: Computer Professionals For Social Responsibility */ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message