Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 03:38:41 -0400 From: "SigmaX asdf" <fydernix@gmail.com> To: "Igor Robul" <igorr@speechpro.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gateway Message-ID: <c04d7e300607310038s76646aa2h5ad86c95dbb0a700@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20060729191915.GA11595@sysadm.stc> References: <c04d7e300607281600o421d8eddn2dc2d374767ec32@mail.gmail.com> <20060729070410.GD8063@sysadm.stc> <c04d7e300607291042s7dc4730fs9d513ab6ff15c058@mail.gmail.com> <20060729191915.GA11595@sysadm.stc>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I take it firewall_type="OPEN" does not include the divert rule? The handbooks reads "The kernel source needs 'option divert' statement added to the other IPFIREWALL statements compiled into a custom kernel." Is this still the case in FreeBSD 6.1? Or am I covered by the IPDIVERT module or something? SigmaX On 7/29/06, Igor Robul <igorr@speechpro.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:42:41PM -0400, SigmaX asdf wrote: > > >^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > > >Should be natd_enable="YES" > > > > > > Heh; yeah, typo in my post. The file has it ok. Is there something I > have > > to do to specify the interfaces which have nat enabled? Does > natd_enable > > automatically forward any/every packet to any/every interface? > Personally I use ipfilter, but for ipfw/natd you need to specify > "divert" rule. You can find many examples, including ones in FreeBSD > handbook. >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c04d7e300607310038s76646aa2h5ad86c95dbb0a700>