From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 13 08:14:00 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A387116A47C;
	Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:14:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from jengal.datamax.bg (jengal.datamax.bg [82.103.104.21])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EC4243CD2;
	Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:11:51 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from vd@datamax.bg)
Received: from qlovarnika.bg.datamax (qlovarnika.bg.datamax [192.168.10.2])
	by jengal.datamax.bg (Postfix) with SMTP id 6AC1EB864;
	Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:13:18 +0200 (EET)
Received: (nullmailer pid 54583 invoked by uid 1002);
	Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:13:18 -0000
Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 10:13:18 +0200
From: Vasil Dimov <vd@FreeBSD.org>
To: Jun Kuriyama <kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
Message-ID: <20061213081318.GB53907@qlovarnika.bg.datamax>
References: <7mu003jdyg.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
	<457DA05F.8010805@FreeBSD.org>
	<7mr6v6ht57.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
	<457E5DB4.7030204@FreeBSD.org>
	<7mbqm9ijr9.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
	<20061212145124.GA3446@straylight.m.ringlet.net>
	<457F10E5.5070901@FreeBSD.org>
	<7mu000h8nz.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <7mu000h8nz.wl%kuriyama@imgsrc.co.jp>
Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: HEADS UP : security/gnupg will be upgraded to 2.0.1
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: vd@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 13 Dec 2006 08:14:00 -0000


--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Dec 13, 2006 at 10:44:00AM +0900, Jun Kuriyama wrote:
> At Tue, 12 Dec 2006 12:28:21 -0800,
> Doug Barton wrote:
[...]
> > What might make sense is for the gnupg 2.x port to install a gpg
> > symlink to gpg2. I've done that on my own system for convenience sake.
> > That will get hairy if the user tries to install gnupg 1.x though.
> > Both gnupg ports will need logic to handle what to do with the symlink
> > if the other port is installed.
>=20
> Seems fine.  Like this?

Just my 2 cents:

-		NLS "Native Language Support" on \
[...]
+OPTIONS=3D	NLS "Include National Language Support" on \

I believe the N in NLS stands for Native.
=20
[...]
+verify:	checksum
+	gpg --verify ${DISTDIR}/${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX}.sig

You are referencing the old gpg executable here (or the link in which
case it does not matter) here.
Is this intentional? Shouldn't it be gpg2?

--=20
Vasil Dimov
gro.DSBeerF@dv
%
Westheimer's Discovery:
        A couple of months in the laboratory can
        frequently save a couple of hours in the library.

--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFFf7YeFw6SP/bBpCARAv16AKDCAmKWssJH/tVw9WnAszfK5Yt6BACcCzFL
cMh7YNMo2hveJtst8xImDH4=
=GCdI
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--s/l3CgOIzMHHjg/5--