From owner-freebsd-current Thu May 9 15: 1:22 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from fw.wemm.org (12-232-135-171.client.attbi.com [12.232.135.171]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 118BD37B401 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:01:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: from overcee.wemm.org (overcee.wemm.org [10.0.0.3]) by fw.wemm.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g49M1E439018 for ; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:01:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) Received: from wemm.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by overcee.wemm.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B513538CC; Thu, 9 May 2002 15:01:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from peter@wemm.org) X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5 07/13/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Mark Murray Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Perl scripts that need rewiting - Any volunteers? In-Reply-To: <200205091608.g49G8qjV024230@grimreaper.grondar.org> Date: Thu, 09 May 2002 15:01:14 -0700 From: Peter Wemm Message-Id: <20020509220114.B513538CC@overcee.wemm.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Mark Murray wrote: > > [bogus From: address, because people cannot be bothered to respect Reply-To :] > > > > On Thu, May 09, 2002 at 10:57:00AM +0100, Mark Murray wrote: > > > It would be acceptable to rewrite in C (C++?) > > > > NO! for rewriting in C++. If you do, you'll soon see the consequences. > > (and that is all I am going to elude to at this time) > > Need info here :-). Has this to do with GCC 3.x? Yes. The problem is libstdc++-v3. > (And if so, are we in trouble with groff?) Partly. groff isn't a big libstdc++ user. It is mostly a C-with-classes and almost exclusively a libc user. Cheers, -Peter -- Peter Wemm - peter@wemm.org; peter@FreeBSD.org; peter@yahoo-inc.com "All of this is for nothing if we don't go to the stars" - JMS/B5 To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message