From owner-freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 17 11:26:11 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A5F71065672 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:26:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@modulus.org) Received: from email.octopus.com.au (email.octopus.com.au [122.100.2.232]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C00188FC08 for ; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from andrew@modulus.org) Received: by email.octopus.com.au (Postfix, from userid 1002) id B756317D17; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:26:32 +1000 (EST) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on email.octopus.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.4 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED autolearn=failed version=3.2.3 Received: from [10.20.30.102] (60.218.233.220.static.exetel.com.au [220.233.218.60]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: admin@email.octopus.com.au) by email.octopus.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C8EE173D3; Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:26:28 +1000 (EST) Message-ID: <4A38D1F9.6020105@modulus.org> Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 21:22:33 +1000 From: Andrew Snow User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.6 (X11/20070926) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ivan Voras , freebsd-fs@freebsd.org References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: Re: ZFS performance on 7.2-release/amd64 low compared to UFS2 + SoftUpdates X-BeenThere: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Filesystems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2009 11:26:11 -0000 Further to this, the gap between ZFS and UFS grows even larger when you compare ZFS software RAID with UFS on hardware RAID. (with ZFS beating UFS rather soundly)