Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 1 Aug 2006 09:40:16 +0900
From:      Pyun YongHyeon <pyunyh@gmail.com>
To:        Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
Cc:        cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/sys/dev/em if_em.c
Message-ID:  <20060801004016.GB39581@cdnetworks.co.kr>
In-Reply-To: <20060731194311.GV96644@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <200607200357.k6K3vwg2039627@repoman.freebsd.org> <20060731131502.GS96644@FreeBSD.org> <20060731144841.Y71432@fledge.watson.org> <20060731194311.GV96644@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 11:43:11PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
 > On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 02:49:05PM +0100, Robert Watson wrote:
 > R> On Mon, 31 Jul 2006, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
 > R> 
 > R> >On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 03:57:58AM +0000, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
 > R> >P> yongari     2006-07-20 03:57:58 UTC
 > R> >P>
 > R> >P>   FreeBSD src repository
 > R> >P>
 > R> >P>   Modified files:
 > R> >P>     sys/dev/em           if_em.c
 > R> >P>   Log:
 > R> >P>   Honor IFF_DRV_OACTIVE in em_start_locked().
 > R> >
 > R> >Isn't it better to shift this change to the em_start(), to avoid double 
 > R> >check of IFF_DRV_RUNNING? Or may be just merge em_start_locked() into the 
 > R> >em_start()?
 > R> 
 > R> Isn't em_start_locked() called from quite a few different places, including 
 > R> the interrupt handler, etc, where the mutex is already held?
 > 
 > It is, so the latter idea won't work. However, in all these places
 > we can know the status of IFF_DRV_OACTIVE before calling the start
 > routine.
 > 

You're right. Feel free to fix it.
I have to solve re(4) issues on sparc64 at the moment...

-- 
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060801004016.GB39581>