Date: Sun, 19 May 2002 13:29:25 -0700 From: Marcel Moolenaar <marcel@xcllnt.net> To: "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: Brian Somers <brian@Awfulhak.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Restricting umasks in periodic scripts Message-ID: <20020519202925.GA17015@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> In-Reply-To: <20020519004512.C67779@blossom.cjclark.org> References: <200205171420.g4HEKSWs093218@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> <20020519004512.C67779@blossom.cjclark.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, May 19, 2002 at 12:45:12AM -0700, Crist J. Clark wrote: > > As for -STABLE, I haven't really heard any complaints? Might be a bit > late to change the status quo before 4.6-RELEASE. Wouldn't it be a POLA violation anyway or is there enough security concern to overrule POLA? -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020519202925.GA17015>