Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 15 Jul 2018 11:55:54 -0600
From:      Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To:        "K. Macy" <kmacy@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu>, Ian Lepore <ian@freebsd.org>,  FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: [PATCH] Recent libm additions
Message-ID:  <CANCZdfrYrz0971Grk5E-hrQd%2BAPZVfNewvDPj19D-T_JZ_1kJw@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAHM0Q_OMYUe4CDemC8Gx9AGzA%2BwK0cctwUhHieeQi2xdDs0urA@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20180715150638.GA30154@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <1531674041.26036.1.camel@freebsd.org> <20180715171737.GA31164@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <CAHM0Q_OMYUe4CDemC8Gx9AGzA%2BwK0cctwUhHieeQi2xdDs0urA@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jul 15, 2018, 11:23 AM K. Macy <kmacy@freebsd.org> wrote:

> >
> > Well, actually, the functions in polevll.c should have been copied
> > into ld80/e_powl.c, and polevall.c should never have been committed.
> > Unfortunately, the code was not reviewed for correctness.
>
> That is not correct. Please stop repeating it. Bruce Evans and John
> Baldwin were both looped in. Neither made this observation.
>

Steve is the fp guy these days. And it wasn't reviewed by him. He's mad you
cut him out of the loop. Arguing about pedantic points of process does no
one any good.

Warner

_______________________________________________
> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CANCZdfrYrz0971Grk5E-hrQd%2BAPZVfNewvDPj19D-T_JZ_1kJw>