Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2018 18:46:49 +0100 From: "Dries Michiels" <driesm.michiels@gmail.com> To: "'Andrey V. Elsukov'" <bu7cher@yandex.ru>, <freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org>, <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Configuring IPv6 on jails Message-ID: <008801d46faf$5ee08780$1ca19680$@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <edadee75-045e-dd57-f3f4-7ed820dc275f@yandex.ru> References: <005c01d46f97$8389d4a0$8a9d7de0$@gmail.com> <edadee75-045e-dd57-f3f4-7ed820dc275f@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: Andrey V. Elsukov <bu7cher@yandex.ru> > Sent: maandag 29 oktober 2018 18:35 > To: Dries Michiels <driesm.michiels@gmail.com>; = freebsd-ipfw@freebsd.org; > freebsd-net@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Configuring IPv6 on jails >=20 > On 29.10.2018 17:56, Dries Michiels wrote: > > * Use IPFW IPv6 prefix translation for the jail /64 prefix; = translate > > between global routable /64 prefix and fd00::1/64 (as example). The > > latter can be statically configured in jail.conf. > > > > My problem here is that the IPFW rule needs the external prefix as = an > > argument. My prefix is dynamic so this might be tricky and indicates > > scripting to me. > > > > Isn't there a way to let IPFW determine what interface to use (and > > thus IPv6 > > prefix) for external translation? (for IPv4 NAT there is no need to > > specify the external IPv4 address) >=20 > Hi, >=20 > I think I can add this feature to ipfw_nptv6 module, but I need some = spare > time to implement it. If you are interested, I'll send the patch to = you later. > What version do you use? I suspect the patch will use some features, = that are > present only in head/ yet. Would be nice! I=E2=80=99m on 12-STABLE. > -- > WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?008801d46faf$5ee08780$1ca19680$>