From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 15 21:22:40 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2AF0BB37 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:22:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA115C70 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:22:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y0d66-0000kC-Vn for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:22:31 +0100 Received: from a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.154.115.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:22:30 +0100 Received: from rakuco by a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2014 22:22:30 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: Re: Giving Up Maintainership Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 23:22:17 +0200 Lines: 15 Message-ID: <86zjaowquu.fsf@FreeBSD.org> References: <548EF8D5.8090005@FreeBSD.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.4 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:U/EOp1R12n+0n02sdPq+pIItm0U= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 21:22:40 -0000 Guido Falsi writes: > Unluckily upgrading it will be a problem since new version depends on > Python QT5 libraries. > > So I take a chance to ask: > > Is there any active work on creating ports for these? > > Who should I talk about this to? I don't think anyone is working on this at the moment. If you're willing to do it, please keep kde@ in the loop, as we maintain the existing PyQt4 ports and will probably end up either maintaining or touching the Qt5 ports a lot.