Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 16:22:57 -0400 (EDT) From: Seth <seth@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> To: Terry Lambert <tlambert@primenet.com> Cc: Jonathan Walther <krooger@debian.org>, jesus.monroy@usa.net, advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Linux vs. NT, take 2.] Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9906291620290.63857-100000@freebie.dp.ny.frb.org> In-Reply-To: <199906292016.NAA24314@usr08.primenet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Talk to Mike Smith. FreeBSD's numbers are worse than Linux's. > Is there any validity to the discussion on -hackers that real-world application performance doesn't corroborate the poor benchmark results (as far as FreeBSD is concerned)? I'm less concerned that benchmarks aren't good than I am that my application performance suffers relative to other platforms. SB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.10.9906291620290.63857-100000>