From owner-freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Mon Feb 20 20:41:47 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E21D5CE6CB8 for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from zxy.spb.ru (zxy.spb.ru [195.70.199.98]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A37883EB for ; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:41:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from slw@zxy.spb.ru) Received: from slw by zxy.spb.ru with local (Exim 4.86 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1cfumF-000HmE-U3; Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:41:43 +0300 Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 23:41:43 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov To: Steven Hartland Cc: Gleb Popov <6yearold@gmail.com>, freebsd-hackers Subject: Re: FreeBSD CARP load balancing. Message-ID: <20170220204143.GD15630@zxy.spb.ru> References: <5e139f90-89c0-e4c4-46c3-457f1fd02c74@multiplay.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: slw@zxy.spb.ru X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on zxy.spb.ru); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 20:41:48 -0000 On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 07:16:30PM +0000, Steven Hartland wrote: > On 20/02/2017 19:07, Gleb Popov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 20, 2017 at 12:01 PM, Steven Hartland > > > wrote: > > > > Does LAGG do what you need? > > > > > > Doesn't seem so. I need to balance incoming traffic between several > > hosts. If I understood it correctly, lagg can be used to load-balance > > outgoing traffic only. > > LAGG does incoming and outgoing but only on a single host, so it does > sound like it won't help you. > > That said what your doing does sound quite out of the ordinary, is there > a reason you're trying to copy the traffic to multiple hosts? Just for record: multichassis lacp exist (not for FreeBSD). http://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/td/docs/ios/cether/configuration/guide/ce_mlacp.html