Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 5 Aug 2012 13:22:17 +0200 (CEST)
From:      Wojciech Puchar <wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
To:        Marco Muskus <marcomuskus@une.net.co>
Cc:        centos@centos.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: compare zfs xfs and jfs o
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl>
In-Reply-To: <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co>
References:  <CAFBRBcoxr5HLVipX5L5=qhEZ7pOW+4NmWJwy3GsL_DH74Fm+yQ@mail.gmail.com> <501D8A3D.1000707@une.net.co>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
> Hi Ashkan,
>
> I think that XFS & JFS are more mature filesystems than ZFS, but the feature 
> set of ZFS i ahead in the future. For a NFS server first I'll go with ZFS 
> because the consistence in disk and speed will gonna be the differentiator.
true. it is consistently slow.

REALLY from what tale do you people get such a statements.


>
> Look at L2ARC and ZIL to improve ZFS speed.

it's far better to just put manually heavily used things to SSD.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <http://docs.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1208051321170.21508>