Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 07:05:30 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au> Cc: smp@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: wakeup handling on SMP boxes Message-ID: <20020912070529.B98735@iguana.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <20020912232323.G6445-100000@gamplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:41:54PM %2B1000 References: <20020912043148.B98062@iguana.icir.org> <20020912232323.G6445-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 12, 2002 at 11:41:54PM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: ... > I think the values of kernel priority don't actually matter much. > If there are no competing processes in the kernel, then any priority > will do. If there are some, then in most cases it doesn't help for > them to be different, since scheduling decisions usually aren't acted > on until the current process returns to user mode. precisely my point... cheers luigi To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020912070529.B98735>