From owner-freebsd-questions  Wed Mar 20 18:57:50 1996
Return-Path: owner-questions
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA29969
          for questions-outgoing; Wed, 20 Mar 1996 18:57:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from jmb@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA29963
          Wed, 20 Mar 1996 18:57:49 -0800 (PST)
From: "Jonathan M. Bresler" <jmb>
Message-Id: <199603210257.SAA29963@freefall.freebsd.org>
Subject: Re: ssh-1.2.10; ok to run?
To: jbarrm@panix.com (Barry Masterson)
Date: Wed, 20 Mar 1996 18:57:49 -0800 (PST)
Cc: questions@freebsd.org
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.960320213526.17513A-100000@jbarrm.dialup.access.net> from "Barry Masterson" at Mar 20, 96 09:55:21 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-questions@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk


	use ssh-1.2.13  earlier versions we less secure than desireable
	see the web page:  http://www.cs.hut.fi/ssh/

Barry Masterson wrote:
> 
> I've been looking around for the ssh stuff, and have seen readme's
> saying that the (ports version ssh-1.2.10) is a beta release, and
> may be unstable.  There are of course earlier, and later versions
> available, but the port is for 1.2.10
> 
> Has anyone, is anyone using it?  Any horror stories?
> 
> As far as I can tell, there are no ssh files in the 2.1.0-release
> packages directory at wcarchive. So I'm looking into the compiling the
> ports collection. (/ports/security/ssh)
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Barry Masterson
> jbarrm@panix.com
> >--->--->--->--->--->
>   FreeBSD   2.1.0-R
> <---<---<---<---<---<
> 
>