Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Jul 1998 15:31:43 -0500 (CDT)
From:      John Heyer <john@jfive.com>
To:        freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   FS Questsion - UFS vs. ext2
Message-ID:  <Pine.BSF.3.96.980717152034.19019A-100000@snake.supranet.net>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

I have a SyQuest drive with cartridges I intend to share between a Linux
and FreeBSD box.  My question is if I should "format" the cartridges with
FreeBSD's UFS file system or Linux's Ext2, or more specifically what the
performance difference is.  I know that UFS is roughly 2x faster over
MSDOS FAT, but am not sure about ext2.  Linux supposedly supports UFS r/o,
but I've had problems before (I believe the actually error messages was
"I/O Error: Fu**ing Sun Blows Me") and I'd prefer ext2.  I know FreeBSD has 
supported ext2 r/w for a while, but will I lose performance?  Also, can I
change permissions on the ext2 drive while it's mounted under FreeBSD?

--
"Calling the Lilith Fair 'A Celebration of Women in Music' is like calling
Burger King 'A Celebration of Food'."	-- Deborah Wolfinsohn

John "The Fisherman" Heyer - http://john.jfive.com
The Bastard Boat - http://primus.jfive.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.3.96.980717152034.19019A-100000>