From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Feb 16 11:49:32 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E31616A4CE for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:49:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE2C543D1D for ; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:49:31 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jshamlet@comcast.net) Received: from localhost.invalid (pcp04637401pcs.gambrl01.md.comcast.net[68.49.84.210]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <2004021619493101200bq2ice>; Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:49:31 +0000 From: "J. Seth Henry" To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 14:49:29 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.6 References: <20040216160456.BB35316A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20040216160456.BB35316A4CF@hub.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <200402161449.29820.jshamlet@comcast.net> cc: "Daniel R. Curran" Subject: Re: Firefox Process Not Exiting X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 19:49:32 -0000 > Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 09:17:46 -0500 > From: "Daniel R. Curran" > Subject: Re: Firefox Process Not Exiting > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Message-ID: <4030D10A.6060704@cs.rit.edu> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=3Dus-ascii; format=3Dflowed > > Seeing as the problem would now seem to be in the linuxpluginwrapper or > linux-flashplugin port is there a way to fix this problem? Is there any > work being done on it? is it a known bug? What would the process be for > one to get the ball rolling towards a fix? > > Thanks, > Dan > > Matthew Seaman wrote: > >On Mon, Feb 16, 2004 at 09:15:43PM +1100, Gautam Gopalakrishnan wrote: > > =A0 > > > >>On Mon, 16 Feb 2004 00:12:56 -0500 > >>"Daniel R. Curran" wrote: > >> > >> =A0 =A0 > >> > >>>I am wondering if anyone else has this issue and if there is a fix for > >>> > >>>it. When I run firefox and then exit the program the process remains > >>>resident, and it starts eating up the CPU. Does anyone know of a fix > >>>for this. I have been manually killing the process, but this seems > >>>like a horrible way to work with the program. > >>> =A0 =A0 =A0 > >> > >>One more vote from me. Same behaviour with firebird too. So it's not > >>newly introduced... > >> =A0 =A0 > > > >I've seen this happen with all of Mozilla, Firebird and now Firefox. > >It's only certain web sites that trigger the effect, and it seems to > >happen on sites which make use of a large amount of Flash stuff -- the > >effect is even caused by Macromedia's test page at > >http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/welcome/ -- although quite often > >what happens is that the flash infexted page will only load once (if > >at all) and after that the whole browser freezes up and has to be > >killed from the command line. > > > >I'd say it's more likely a bug in the linuxpluginwrapper or > >linux-flashplugin ports. > > > >=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Cheers, > > > >=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Matthew > > > > =A0 Guys, If it is the plug-in, then it affects more than just Linux/*BSD. I had this= =20 same problem occur on a Windows box the other day. My fiancee, a diehard=20 AOL'er, sent me an e-card, and when I closed Mozilla after viewing it, the= =20 window closed, but I had a mozilla process sucking up all available cycles.= I=20 noticed this because the CPU fan went from its normal 55% on, to full up=20 100%. IOW - it may be something in Mozilla/FireFox itself. Unfortunately, Mozilla= =20 didn't technically crash, so I'm not sure how useful a bug report would be. Regards, Seth Henry