Date: Thu, 13 May 2010 00:02:14 -0400 From: Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> To: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Christian Brueffer <brueffer@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: svn commit: r208002 - head Message-ID: <4BEB79C6.1050105@buffalo.edu> In-Reply-To: <AANLkTil8VxmngA5FgCmdztYQmk98hEXJxjjJQSnlDDb-@mail.gmail.com> References: <201005122120.o4CLK4RE026849@svn.freebsd.org> <AANLkTilzq7eRLQb4AnYQRrFJN27BH6ij5Jr8NdIJbaVO@mail.gmail.com> <4BEB73FF.8040601@buffalo.edu> <AANLkTil8VxmngA5FgCmdztYQmk98hEXJxjjJQSnlDDb-@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/12/10 11:52 PM, pluknet wrote: > On 13 May 2010 07:37, Ken Smith <kensmith@buffalo.edu> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> On 5/12/10 11:13 PM, pluknet wrote: >>> On 13 May 2010 01:20, Christian Brueffer <brueffer@freebsd.org> wrote: >>>> Author: brueffer >>>> Date: Wed May 12 21:20:04 2010 >>>> New Revision: 208002 >>>> URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/208002 >>>> >>>> Log: >>>> Note 8.0-RELEASE. >>>> >>>> PR: 143824 >>>> Submitted by: pluknet <pluknet@gmail.com> >>>> >>>> Modified: >>>> head/UPDATING >>>> >>>> Modified: head/UPDATING >>>> ============================================================================== >>>> --- head/UPDATING Wed May 12 20:58:08 2010 (r208001) >>>> +++ head/UPDATING Wed May 12 21:20:04 2010 (r208002) >>>> @@ -83,6 +83,9 @@ NOTE TO PEOPLE WHO THINK THAT FreeBSD 9. >>>> >>>> The meanings correspond to the relevant IPv4 variables. >>>> >>>> +20091125: >>>> + 8.0-RELEASE. >>>> + >>>> 20091113: >>>> The default terminal emulation for syscons(4) has been changed >>>> from cons25 to xterm on all platforms except pc98. This means >>> >>> Woops, that should have been committed directly to stable/8, not touching head. >>> >> >> Why should it be added to stable/8 when no other release is noted >> there? >> > > No other release is rather not *yet* noted there, I would say, since > that's the first one. > If you look at the previous stable branches, you''ll find a scheme, where each > stable branch has notes about every releases, besides from that branch only. > If that scheme was changed before stable/8, please correct me. > Grumble. Yes you're right. I forgot that one gets added to both the releng/X.Y/UPDATING and stable/X/UPDATING. No previous mentions of releases because that version of UPDATING had most recently been on HEAD and that's the one that never gets the release dates noted on it, just the branch dates. Sorry, long day... :-( -- Ken Smith - From there to here, from here to | kensmith@buffalo.edu there, funny things are everywhere. | - Theodore Geisel |
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BEB79C6.1050105>