From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 29 13:38:01 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC2E3106566B for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:38:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-firewire@m.gmane.org) Received: from lo.gmane.org (lo.gmane.org [80.91.229.12]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A8AA88FC13 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:38:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1Mscu0-0008If-Iw for freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:38:00 +0200 Received: from 141.76.6.131 ([141.76.6.131]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:38:00 +0200 Received: from js by 141.76.6.131 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:38:00 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org From: Julian Stecklina Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:37:48 +0200 Lines: 26 Message-ID: <87iqf1dg7n.fsf@tabernacle.localhost> References: <1253949811.2729.6.camel@Lappy> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 141.76.6.131 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:rwXnX7OWnKJcC9LYwEVeNgLzJcU= Sender: news Subject: Re: FireWire Patch [8/HEAD] X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:38:02 -0000 Sean Bruno writes: > Ok folks, some time has passed and I was able to get some wisdom from > the CAM folks in Colorado (Thanks Scott, Justin, Warner, Ken). > > For those of you experiencing boot failures with firewire/sbp enabled in > your configuration, please try the following patch and let me see the > full boot dmesg. > > This is an extensive patch that does "stuff" and "things". :-) > > Mainly, it should behave better at initialization time and play nice > with CAM and the scheduler via a config_intrhook. > > Let me know --> http://consultcsg.com/firewire.diff The box that exhibits the problem is currently repurposed for other tasks. So I cannot test this at the moment. If no one else steps up to test this, I can test it in a week or so. Regards, -- Julian Stecklina The day Microsoft makes something that doesn't suck is probably the day they start making vacuum cleaners - Ernst Jan Plugge