Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2015 09:49:32 -0700 From: Karl Young <karly@kipshouse.org> To: Nagy =?iso-8859-1?B?TOFzemzz?= Zsolt <gandalf@shopzeus.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Cannot test spamassassin, what is going on here? Message-ID: <20150909164931.GB11226@mailboy.kipshouse.net> In-Reply-To: <55F0212B.9090708@shopzeus.com> References: <55F0212B.9090708@shopzeus.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nagy László Zsolt(gandalf@shopzeus.com)@2015.09.09 14:08:11 +0200: > Given a test file "test.eml" I can run this test: > > spamassassin -t test.eml > > and I get this: > > > > >-- > >This message has been scanned for viruses and > >dangerous content by MailScanner, and is > >believed to be clean. > > > >Spam detection software, running on the system "shopzeus.com", > >has NOT identified this incoming email as spam. The original > >message has been attached to this so you can view it or label > >similar future email. If you have any questions, see > >The administrator of that system for details. > > > >Content preview: We've run into ths bug: > >https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=148581 > > [libc] fopen(3) fails with EMFILE if there are more than > >SHORT_MAX fds open > > [...] > > > >Content analysis details: (-5.0 points, 5.0 required) > > > > pts rule name description > >---- ---------------------- > >-------------------------------------------------- > >-5.0 RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI RBL: Sender listed at > >http://www.dnswl.org/, high > > trust > > [8.8.178.116 listed in list.dnswl.org] > > However, the very same email went through postfix/Mailscanner and > resulted in these headers: > > >X-shopzeus-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information > >X-shopzeus-MailScanner-ID: 4FFF48895E15.AB608 > >X-shopzeus-MailScanner: Found to be clean > >X-shopzeus-MailScanner-SpamCheck: spam, JUNKEMAIL > >X-shopzeus-MailScanner-From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > >X-Spam-Status: Yes > > So the "spamassassin -t" command gives -5.0 score identifying as > ham, but when the email actually comes in then it is identified as > spam. > > Looks like spamassassin is using different rules/settings when it is > ran from the mailscanner daemon. The configuration should be the > same ( /usr/local/etc/mail/spamassassin is a symbolic link to > /usr/local/etc/MailScanner/spam.assassin.prefs.conf ) > > I cannot test spamassassin with the same user, because it is postfix > which is disabled: > > > > ># su postfix " spamassassin -t test.eml " > >This account is currently not available. > > > How to overcome this problem? What is going on here? I'm no SA expert, but I believe it will take the reputation of the sender into account. So if the mail content is marginal, it might pass the local test, but if the sending IP has a poor reputation, it could push it into the spam range. -karl > > Thanks > > Laszlo > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-questions@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-questions-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150909164931.GB11226>