From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Mar 13 02:51:28 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id CAA01681 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 02:51:28 -0800 Received: from aio.auglink.org (aio.auglink.org [204.183.221.127]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA01672 for ; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 02:51:24 -0800 Received: (from erich@localhost) by aio.auglink.org (8.6.8/8.6.6) id CAA25100 for freebsd-questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 13 Mar 1995 02:12:24 -0500 From: "Eric L. Hinson" Message-Id: <199503130712.CAA25100@aio.auglink.org> Subject: Sanity of FreeBSD 2.0R (Help?) To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Date: Mon, 13 Mar 1995 02:12:24 -0500 (EST) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 1089 Sender: questions-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Hi there, I have been having considerable difficulty in compiling various programs (even recompiling the kernel). :( These programs compile ok on the 1.1.5.1 box (that this one will replace). I installed from the 2.0R CD from Walnut Creek, and used the updated boot and cpio floppies from ftp.freebsd.org. Installed everything except X (which tie install didn't seem to want to install for some reason). What I need to know is what would I need to do in order to get the OS to become more sane (and compile programs without bombing out) state before opening it up to users? I wish we could hold off until 2.1 is released, We are already weeks behind in getting this new machine up and running after wrestling with a comercial unix OS which was not supported to the extent that requires. Thanks for taking the time to help me with this. Eric -- Eric L. Hinson :: Internet: erich@auglink.org :: AugLink Public Access Unix Sys Admin :: "Whom the gods would destroy they first send mad" -- J. Duport "The mind is a basket, if you put nothing in you get nothing out" - L'Amour