Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 07 Feb 2006 15:15:51 +1100
From:      Norberto Meijome <freebsd@meijome.net>
To:        FreeBSD Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Conflict? :smbfs built in support and mount_smbfs
Message-ID:  <43E81EF7.9070409@meijome.net>
In-Reply-To: <43E814BC.5010604@meijome.net>
References:  <43E814BC.5010604@meijome.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Norberto Meijome wrote:
> Hi,
> I had my kernel built with the following options
> options         NETSMB                  #SMB/CIFS requester
> options         NETSMBCRYPTO            #encrypted password support for SMB
> 
> which I understand adds the support for smbfs into the kernel itself.
> 
> BUT when using either mount -t smbfs or mount_smfs , I would get:
> [SOMETHING ELSE HERE, $0 possibly] can't load smbfs: File exists
> (aprox error ), implying that it was trying to load the smbfs.ko ... but
> conflicting with the code built into the kernel?
> 
> The worse part is that the mount command would fail.
> 
> I commented out those 2 options *only* and everything works fine again.
> 
> What gives?
> 
> Beto

Sorry, forgot to include version info.
Freebsd 6.0 Stable, built on Jan 30th 06.
world built on Jan 31st , src/contrib/smbfs/mount_smbfs/mount_smbfs.c,v
1.5 2004/09/05 06:42

Beto



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E81EF7.9070409>