From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 26 17:56:33 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADEE16A468 for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from raven.customer.vol.cz (raven.customer.vol.cz [195.250.144.108]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C045E13C48D for ; Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:56:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.0.23] (rb5dg130.net.upc.cz [89.176.238.130]) (authenticated bits=0) by raven.customer.vol.cz (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id l9QHTLpl064390 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:29:23 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) From: Pav Lucistnik To: Alexey Dokuchaev In-Reply-To: <20071026155223.GB7312@FreeBSD.org> References: <1193261223.93212.15.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com> <20071026155223.GB7312@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-M3USZpQy89dWEd9deC4u" Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 19:29:21 +0200 Message-Id: <1193419761.21743.6.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Score: -10.372 () AWL,BAYES_00 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.62 on 195.250.144.108 X-Milter: Spamilter (Reciever: raven.customer.vol.cz; Sender-ip: 89.176.238.130; Sender-helo: [192.168.0.23]; ) Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Jeremy Messenger , Joe Marcus Clarke Subject: Re: HEADS UP: GNOME 2.20 is being merged X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2007 17:56:33 -0000 --=-M3USZpQy89dWEd9deC4u Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alexey Dokuchaev p=ED=B9e v p=E1 26. 10. 2007 v 15:52 +0000: > On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 03:27:58PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > > Before anyone ask about why not test in pointyhat first. We did, but =20 > > pointyhat has stability problems so it has missed some ports. We had to= go =20 > > ahead put in FreeBSD ports tree and we will be working on from there an= d =20 > > we also will be keeping our eyes on pointyhat logs. >=20 > I'm worried about PF date coming too soon. Maybe we should extend it > (say, for a week) so Gnome-related problems can get fixed before the > deadline? And what is the freeze designed for other than fixing port problems? --=20 Pav Lucistnik On second thought, let's not go to Camelot. It is a silly place. --=-M3USZpQy89dWEd9deC4u Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?UTF-8?Q?digit=C3=A1ln=C4=9B?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?UTF-8?Q?_=C4=8D=C3=A1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBHIiPxntdYP8FOsoIRAiaVAJ9HUnaGkZGzqA9Efw8pTPPW04eP0QCguTaA wEROP6VE8prceIxYW2HGwic= =jBOF -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-M3USZpQy89dWEd9deC4u--