From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Nov 24 01:29:07 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7D1316A4CE for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:29:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-234.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.234]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C381343FE0 for ; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:29:05 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5E7CF66C55; Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:29:00 -0800 (PST) Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 01:29:00 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Akinori MUSHA Message-ID: <20031124092900.GA12109@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20031124002433.GB6264@xor.obsecurity.org> <86znemcf0m.knu@iDaemons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <86znemcf0m.knu@iDaemons.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: amd64@FreeBSD.org cc: Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: ruby-1.8.1.p2 broken on amd64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2003 09:29:08 -0000 --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Nov 24, 2003 at 06:06:01PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote: > Hi, >=20 > At Sun, 23 Nov 2003 16:24:33 -0800, > kkenn wrote: > > http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/amd64-5-latest/ruby-1.8.1.p2.log > >=20 > > Can you please investigate ASAP? >=20 > Hmm, I'm a bit confused. The substitute config.guess/sub (in > ports/Template/, which came with a newer autoconf) seem to recognoze > "amd64" and replace it with "x86_64", and as we don't have such a > thing as "x86_64" available from a port, there is no other way than > hardcoding s/amd64/x86_64/ blah blah blah to make packaging > (pkg-plist) work. >=20 > Now, do you know what is the canonical architecture name for the amd64 > platform? Did we diverge from GNU by adopting amd64, or is GNU just > behind us? I checked the just released autoconf 2.58, but the > situation did not seem to have changed. I don't remember..someone on the amd64 list (peter or David) should know. Kris --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/wc9bWry0BWjoQKURAoQ6AJ4p8Vjs10SAK4J/y/cUR3EPxiAyoQCglbq6 d7yOgRq4q/PEKgLlE1omjDE= =E0vI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP--