Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2005 16:54:47 +0300 (MSK) From: Maxim Konovalov <maxim@macomnet.ru> To: Lars Erik Gullerud <lerik@nolink.net> Cc: net@freebsd.org, Doug Barton <dougb@freebsd.org>, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: BUG: ip_output.c FreeBSD 4.11 Message-ID: <20051214165127.B76252@mp2.macomnet.net> In-Reply-To: <20051214144102.Q63851@electra.nolink.net> References: <000001c5fcaa$0988b040$04030201@misho> <439F3F1B.3050608@FreeBSD.org> <20051213220223.GA61287@xor.obsecurity.org> <2a41acea0512131632x23d068e2wb3d66c08e6741ac4@mail.gmail.com> <20051214020913.GA64113@xor.obsecurity.org> <20051214144102.Q63851@electra.nolink.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005, 14:43+0100, Lars Erik Gullerud wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2005, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 04:32:10PM -0800, Jack Vogel wrote: > > > On 12/13/05, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> wrote: > > > > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 01:37:31PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > > > > > Mihail Balikov wrote: > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > > > > > > > > In FreeBSD 4.x in ip_output.c in part for ipfw local forwarding > > > > > > there's typo > > > > > > that will cause kernel panic: > > > > > > > > > > If you haven't already, this should be filed as a problem report. > > > > > > > > I don't know that there's a lot of point since 4.11 is in "legacy" > > > > mode and few developers still use it. > > > > > > The humorous thing is that althought I'm sure its true "few developers" > > > still use it, in places where it has actual commercial use, they are > > > still > > > using 4.x in large numbers. > > > > > > So bottom line... there is value in bugs being noted and filed :) > > > > Sure, I guess..as long as there aren't unrealistic expectations about > > someone fixing it. > > The original mail contained the patch that fixes the problem if I'm > not mistaken, so I guess the only expectations here are that someone > goes and commits it if the OP creates a PR with the patch... Which > shouldn't really be too unrealistic, should it? For the record: Gleb has fixed the issue a couple of days ago before you started this discussion :-) -- Maxim Konovalov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20051214165127.B76252>