Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 03:36:19 -0800 From: "David O'Brien" <TrimYourCc@NUXI.com> To: Paul Richards <paul@originative.co.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Patch for FILE problems (was Re: -CURRENT is bad for me...) Message-ID: <20010215033618.A17098@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <3A8BBA1E.A11923FB@originative.co.uk>; from paul@originative.co.uk on Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:14:38AM %2B0000 References: <200102130120.f1D1KpU56194@mobile.wemm.org> <200102130131.f1D1VrW33790@harmony.village.org> <xzplmrbmk94.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> <3A895FA0.25EBC727@originative.co.uk> <20010213131802.B79651@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A89D5BF.D46B8FCC@originative.co.uk> <20010215021353.D66813@dragon.nuxi.com> <3A8BBA1E.A11923FB@originative.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 15, 2001 at 11:14:38AM +0000, Paul Richards wrote:
> Commercial vendors will skip version numbers in their public releases
> if their internal development required more than one bump.
Which ones? Sun Solaris still ships their libc as "libc.so.1", even in
Solaris 8.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010215033618.A17098>