From owner-freebsd-current Mon Jan 5 09:02:00 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA18298 for current-outgoing; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 09:02:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-current) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [195.8.129.14]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA18145 for ; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 09:00:58 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost.cybercity.dk [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA00311; Mon, 5 Jan 1998 17:57:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Garrett Wollman cc: "Jordan K. Hubbard" , current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Time to retire fetch? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 05 Jan 1998 10:09:42 EST." <199801051509.KAA23284@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Date: Mon, 05 Jan 1998 17:57:17 +0100 Message-ID: <309.884019437@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In message <199801051509.KAA23284@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>, Garrett Wollman write s: ><m> said: > >> I just noticed that FTP in -current now supports http:// style >> fetches, a feature which seems to have crept in under my nose during >> the sync with NetBSD's ftp client. For once I agree with Garrett (this has become a disturbing trend lately, I must be getting older or something... :-). Ftp is named after the protocol it implements, and it should that way... Fetch is more open for interpretation. -- Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."