Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:59:51 -0400
From:      Jerry <>
Subject:   Re: Mailing List Etiquette was freebsd vs. netbsd
Message-ID:  <>
In-Reply-To: <>
References:  <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>

Next in thread | Previous in thread | Raw E-Mail | Index | Archive | Help
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Tue, 16 Jun 2020 17:09:06 +0200, Polytropon commented:
>Interesting apoach. Do you value presentation more than content?
>In case of support, personally I would want something that helps
>me solving my problem, not something that looks good. Sadly, the
>"looks good" has lead to many technically inferior solutions
>becoming a de-facto standard, because the better solutions simply
>"don't look as good".

That reminds me of a story I heard a long time ago pertaining to
"perceived quality". If you happen to fall off a ship into the ocean, do
you really care it the life preserve thrown to you is a bright, shinny
new one, or just one that works?

I have seen a few users here claim if they receive a transmission and
it is not in the format that they approve of, they will delete it. Now,
allow me to say this as nicely as I possible can. If some entity wants
to send an electronic document formated with a 200 character line
length, R2L with the characters inverted, that is their right. If the
intended recipient chooses to discard that communication, that is their

".eussi eht no susnesnoc a ot emoc ot gniog reve era ew yaw on si ereht dna=
 retrats-on a si tI ?daerht siht no emit gnitsaw ew era lleh eht yhW" ,nois=
ulcnoc nI


Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <>