Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 16 Mar 2011 13:45:09 +0300
From:      Konstantin Tokarev <annulen@yandex.ru>
To:        Ade Lovett <ade@freebsd.org>
Cc:        Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>, FreeBSD Ports <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Compiling ports in a post-9.0-RELEASE world
Message-ID:  <9561300272310@web147.yandex.ru>
In-Reply-To: <5868CD2A-5FE3-400F-B081-2123CD33BB48@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <4D7BED01.6000506@FreeBSD.org> <696141300213240@web70.yandex.ru> <20110316091948.GZ46044@droso.net> <20110316093938.GB12965@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <5868CD2A-5FE3-400F-B081-2123CD33BB48@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


16.03.2011, 13:33, "Ade Lovett" <ade@FreeBSD.org>:
> On Mar 16, 2011, at 04:39 , Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
>
>> šWhat will happen to ports in non-clang arches (sparc64, ia64) after 9.0R?
>
> With any luck, they will die a silent death and be pointed in the direction of NetBSD that likes to look after irrelevant architectures. ši386/amd64 for primary use, arm/mips for embedded. šAnything else is just ridiculous.

What about Power Architecrure (formerly PowerPC)? 
It's widely used both for embedded and enterprise (pSeries, Blue Gene, etc.)

-- 
Regards,
Konstantin



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9561300272310>