From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug  9 10:17:11 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B222D13
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Aug 2013 10:17:11 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from demelier.david@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-wg0-x236.google.com (mail-wg0-x236.google.com
 [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c00::236])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 167C52C7B
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri,  9 Aug 2013 10:17:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-wg0-f54.google.com with SMTP id e12so3491000wgh.9
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Fri, 09 Aug 2013 03:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
 bh=HIYnhiBopPOVhrCkPBXot7GlFNyM4V0SIIX5qUwzmnA=;
 b=GUrvKtJdagdbTWY9vDlFjERH6uSB6jMCnK7boH1vIxjEYxOPyELus040i1ya6/3asR
 zW0bcfWcpD0dQG83r7KXhv5TZq/gdJ7Es3ZUPVzVlZW1HZV6+pdiIakS+PYkAh4C/zux
 vu0f8vQoEm2L5I/2aLkb0hsqdj77NYEQMLfAtA1XEoGryel62NFNahzIS0QdiDd0CL+p
 6vZ+75nr/ZWisVg8KsDeFj3w0ugI1/KPRWkmPG/kuAEJQxfSORWGktsOIrBkYE6lZVZh
 DtrHqdlQ9n5+NTpjubXqTDzQR8VkSCY7IrpInL3RIb3wtBz51dPNhEj6OAa7/GO4Uzcx
 0leQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.194.176.74 with SMTP id cg10mr5693231wjc.75.1376043429458;
 Fri, 09 Aug 2013 03:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.194.239.164 with HTTP; Fri, 9 Aug 2013 03:17:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2013 12:17:09 +0200
Message-ID: <CAO+PfDcB3ca+9F-CrJupMecPpKQH_F8bx3NN8vdSkUEPzyGwkw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Question about usbhid.h and dev/usb/usbhid.h
From: David Demelier <demelier.david@gmail.com>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Aug 2013 10:17:11 -0000

Hi,

I'm currently writing a USB driver for the SFML framework. I'm reading
the code of SDL and seen the usage of usbhid.

However, /usr/include/usbhid.h and /usr/include/dev/usb/usbhid.h are
different. But they have both some common functions and the same data
definition.

For instance, enum and structures are identical, but the second one
has much more #define about hid usages.

Why are these files so much different and still having some identical
definitions? Isn't better to add full definitions and data to the
second one and just add a #include <dev/usb/usbhid.h> in
/usr/include/usbhid.h?

Regards,

-- 
Demelier David