Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 08:26:32 +0100 From: Cejka Rudolf <cejkar@fit.vutbr.cz> To: Daniel Lang <dl@leo.org> Cc: hubs@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: which ftpd to use? Message-ID: <20030327072632.GA8846@fit.vutbr.cz> In-Reply-To: <20030326143611.GA20796@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de> References: <20030326143611.GA20796@atrbg11.informatik.tu-muenchen.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Lang wrote (2003/03/26): > We used to have proftpd but, that one runs in to problems with > respect to very long connection delays under load, etc. proftpd is very bad, when anybody uses recursive listing :-( > Btw, is FreeBSD's ftpd now the "lukemftpd" ?? Or not? > It's still in the ports.... lukemftpd in NetBSD has been renamed to tnftpd and it is NetBSD's continuation of standard BSD's ftpd. I switched to it on ftp-master.cz.FreeBSD.org, but I did not search for heavy load reduction, but for the possibility to have access control list. However, in case of commiters/maintainers interest, I have updated port for latest tnftpd-2.0-beta3.tar.gz. -- Rudolf Cejka <cejkar at fit.vutbr.cz> http://www.fit.vutbr.cz/~cejkar Brno University of Technology, Faculty of Information Technology Bozetechova 2, 612 66 Brno, Czech Republic To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hubs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030327072632.GA8846>