From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jul 28 02:15:42 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id CAA02691 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 02:15:42 -0700 Received: from aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw ([140.109.40.248]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id CAA02685 for ; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 02:15:35 -0700 Received: (from taob@localhost) by aries.ibms.sinica.edu.tw (8.6.11/8.6.9) id RAA24293; Fri, 28 Jul 1995 17:14:22 +0800 Date: Fri, 28 Jul 1995 17:14:21 +0800 (CST) From: Brian Tao To: Richard Wackerbarth cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Kernel configuration/compilation tool In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: hackers-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 27 Jul 1995, Richard Wackerbarth wrote: > > Not today :-( Maybe next .... (sometime) > But we should not be building any new mechanisms that are incompatible with > that goal. I don't see anything in the current model that inherently shuts the door on non-Intel ports. Most of the stuff appears as either an "option" or a "device", and those need to be specified no matter which platform you choose to compile for. -- Brian ("Though this be madness, yet there is method in't") Tao taob@gate.sinica.edu.tw <-- work ........ play --> taob@io.org