From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jun 7 19:48:52 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 337D51065674 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:48:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from to.my.trociny@gmail.com) Received: from mail-fx0-f54.google.com (mail-fx0-f54.google.com [209.85.161.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEDA68FC13 for ; Mon, 7 Jun 2010 19:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so2922541fxm.13 for ; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:48:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :x-comment-to:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version :content-type; bh=la+PsLpe1/VPfCe+q3fn0ksSvMrB7xGdZgIBBchEFPQ=; b=JerUX5cRdBlYoZZRFuhmKMEiVF5rwv+w0yZgIIZpKeycd4cWyzjeRl2TeKMgpbPjNK vf87C+o2Jlpi87NzIne/50VnyTf6IHpBHzwaZSQoU/mo73l4ZW27wPtZSnS+E3SEsv3k C2fYnriqzyf7bYu2iZa7Fn78rnp3SXlMd9QZc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:x-comment-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=E4lCox1GfUESMWU7f01g2oyRNu9nXwo+hNDu0yRj/y2xSHo1kW08hVp5aykZWVRoV6 UUbv4Qc0A5yIxuuGosiiQJuIwqRcv6yNipekgJoBSg7D7+ysCXJSYh+oUZw5U+a9trQI 8ime3ob5CiaGWMRDJHwQ6A6eeI0Om+qDm7Rrg= Received: by 10.204.163.66 with SMTP id z2mr7081951bkx.9.1275940130525; Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:48:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([95.69.167.97]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id z7sm21103413bkx.5.2010.06.07.12.48.48 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 07 Jun 2010 12:48:49 -0700 (PDT) From: Mikolaj Golub To: Olaf Seibert References: <20100527131310.GS883@twoquid.cs.ru.nl> <20100527174211.GC1211@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <20100607140611.GX883@twoquid.cs.ru.nl> X-Comment-To: Olaf Seibert Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 22:48:46 +0300 In-Reply-To: <20100607140611.GX883@twoquid.cs.ru.nl> (Olaf Seibert's message of "Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:06:11 +0200") Message-ID: <86mxv6wrmp.fsf@kopusha.home.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pyun YongHyeon , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nfe0 loses network connectivity (8.0-RELEASE-p2) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 07 Jun 2010 19:48:52 -0000 On Mon, 7 Jun 2010 16:06:11 +0200 Olaf Seibert wrote: OS> I do get the impression there is a mbuf leak somehow. On a much older OS> file server (FreeBSD 6.1, serves a bit of NFS but has no ZFS) the mbuf OS> cluster useage is much lower, despite a longer uptime: OS> 256/634/890/25600 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) OS> Also, it shows signs that measures are taken in case of mbuf shortage: OS> 2259806/466391/598621 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) OS> 1016 calls to protocol drain routines OS> whereas the FreeBSD 8.0 machine has zero or very low numbers: OS> 0/3956/1959 requests for mbufs denied (mbufs/clusters/mbuf+clusters) OS> 0 calls to protocol drain routines OS> and useage keeps growing: OS> 26122/1782/27904/32768 mbuf clusters in use (current/cache/total/max) It looks like the issue that has been fixed in STABLE. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=kern/144330 -- Mikolaj Golub