From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 18 21:36:19 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: stable@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A31106564A
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:36:19 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Received: from smarthost1.sentex.ca (smarthost1-6.sentex.ca
	[IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CA458FC0A
	for <stable@freebsd.org>; Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:36:19 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from [IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:49a2:dbc6:564:65a6]
	([IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:4:49a2:dbc6:564:65a6])
	by smarthost1.sentex.ca (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id oAILa99O052266
	(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
	Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:36:09 -0500 (EST) (envelope-from mike@sentex.net)
Message-ID: <4CE59C3F.8020704@sentex.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 16:35:59 -0500
From: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-US;
	rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
References: <20101115211350.GE2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<4CE1FDBA.9030403@sentex.net>
	<20101116094330.GH2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<4CE300DE.8010304@sentex.net>
	<20101116221926.GN2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
	<4CE333EF.10406@sentex.net>
	<20101117163541.GR2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
In-Reply-To: <20101117163541.GR2392@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.1.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.67 on IPv6:2607:f3e0:0:1::12
Cc: stable@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Call for testers: FPU changes
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
	<mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2010 21:36:19 -0000

On 11/17/2010 11:35 AM, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> 
> Meantime, the similar change may be beneficial for padlock(4) too.
> f you are going to test it, please note that most likely, openssl padlock
> engine does not use padlock(4), I do not know for sure.


I did some more tests since someone said they had problems with geli,
ipsec and padlock. In the simple tests I did, I didnt find any
regressions or speed differences.  Info appended to

http://www.tancsa.com/fpu.html

I also compared to stock RELENG_8 and padlock and didnt find any issues.


	---Mike