From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Sep 29 03:11:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Received: from hub.FreeBSD.org (hub.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:88])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 76166C36;
 Mon, 29 Sep 2014 03:11:23 +0000 (UTC)
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 23:11:20 -0400
From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org>
To: beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com
Subject: Re: FreeBSD 10.1-BETA3 Now Available
Message-ID: <20140929031120.GI75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
References: <20140928155118.GA75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
 <fe17030e3efeefb5dfa800b46ee181d9.squirrel@s4bysmmsnraf7eut.onion>
 <20140929025102.GH75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="vMIwsFy2iMQolwSC"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20140929025102.GH75063@hub.FreeBSD.org>
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 11.0-CURRENT amd64
X-SCUD-Definition: Sudden Completely Unexpected Dataloss
X-SULE-Definition: Sudden Unexpected Learning Event
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org,
 FreeBSD Release Engineering Team <re@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code <freebsd-stable.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-stable/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable>,
 <mailto:freebsd-stable-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2014 03:11:24 -0000


--vMIwsFy2iMQolwSC
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:51:02PM -0400, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 04:45:21AM +0200, beeessdee@ruggedinbox.com wrote:
> > Why 10.1-BETA3 announcement signed with not usual PGP key?
> >=20
>=20
> Because it is a BETA build, and not a release.
>=20

After re-reading your reply, I realize I haven't sent my last set of PGP
subkeys.

Anyway, this is not RE-related.

Glen


--vMIwsFy2iMQolwSC
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
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=UQ+c
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vMIwsFy2iMQolwSC--