Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2004 02:05:34 +0100 From: Kees Plonsz <kees@jeremino.homeunix.net> To: dave <dmehler26@woh.rr.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: just a couple quick pf/nat questions Message-ID: <20041214010537.B449E43D1F@mx1.FreeBSD.org> References: <list.freebsd.questions#20041213203548.GC69026@keyslapper.org> <list.freebsd.questions#000801c4e172$a9e49df0$0400a8c0@satellite>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
dave wrote: > Hi, > I use to use ipf under pre-5.3. NOw i have switched to pf for various > reasons. I have not as of yet deployed it on my router, but i will be > doing so. In looking it over, i do not believe pf needs nat_enable it does > all it's nats within the pf.conf file. > HTH > Dave. > Why are there three ways of filtering and natting ip-packets ? ipfw - This is how my router is working at the moment ipf - I am just reading and testing this, looks nice pf - looks the same as ipf They all have stateful filtering and nat. What should I chose ?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041214010537.B449E43D1F>