Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 05:24:51 -0700 (PDT) From: "Jeffrey Bouquet" <jbtakk@iherebuywisely.com> To: "pkg" <pkg@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: [CFT] Call for testing pkg 1.5.0 Message-ID: <E1YdHhT-0002ug-32@rmm6prod02.runbox.com> In-Reply-To: <212148.13892.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>On Wed, 1 Apr 2015 11:48:27 +0000 (UTC), "Thomas Mueller" <mueller6724@bel= lsouth.net> wrote: > Excerpt from Baptiste Daroussin: > I noticed subversion bumped due to a vuxml vulnerability. It built but did= not install,=20 pkg-static not found [five or so files] ... in STAGE... reinstalled the earlier version by "pkg install subversion" Could STAGE >> << PKG installs be developed and tested further so that th= is would never happen? It did not used to under the old packaging system and is a regression in relia= bility* it seems, especially for overnight production machine upgrades where the earlier package may not to = found, or not compatible with other ports upgraded in the same session. Something like a test-stage-INSTALL before .build-done so the error is cau= ght earlier. Seems like a missing in the stage coding requirements. Can't help from here, never tried to sta= ge/maintain a port.=20=20 ***reliability for production***=20=20=20=20=20=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E1YdHhT-0002ug-32>