Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 14 Jul 2012 22:29:53 +0200
From:      Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com>
Cc:        ajtiM <lumiwa@gmail.com>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: LibreOffice 3.5.4_1
Message-ID:  <5001D6C1.1080901@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207141316010.60762@wonkity.com>
References:  <201207140756.35423.lumiwa@gmail.com> <5001712A.3010600@FreeBSD.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1207141316010.60762@wonkity.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2012-07-14 21:18, Warren Block wrote:> On Sat, 14 Jul 2012, Dimitry Andric wrote:
>> On 2012-07-14 14:56, ajtiM wrote:
> I ran portmaster -a on FreeBSD 9.0 Release and it shows me to update LibreOffice
>>> 3.5.4 to 3.5.4_1 but also update Clang to 3.1_1.
>>> FreeBSD 9.0 Release has Clang 3.0 and I didn't have a problem to build
>>> LibreOffice 3.5.4. Do I need this update? Is it not possible anymore to use
>>> Clang 3.0?
>> Just set WITH_SYSTEM_CLANG=x for this port.  This allows you to build it
>> with the base clang.
> But it needs the SemaDeclCXX.cpp patch to clang also.  Don't know if 
> that will apply to 9.0-RELEASE.

No, clang 3.0 (which is in 9.0 release) does not have the problem that
causes an assertion during LibreOffice build.  It would be nice if Mitja
can confirm that clang 3.0 can fully build LO.  Even nicer if it runs
without immediately crashing. :)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5001D6C1.1080901>